Yamaha 2007 R1

According to Yamaha the liter-bike crowd is comprised almost entirely of males (97 percent), are on average 33 years old, have 13 years riding experience, and ride approximately 7,300 miles per year. First-time buyers make up less than 10 percent of sportbikes displacing 1000cc. We could also extrapolate from Yamaha's number crunching that the liter-bike owner is probably wiser, and not just older. It seems that 1000cc junkies are "...more focused on commuting, less on touring and slightly more focused on track riding..." as compared to the industry average. Specifically of the R1, Yamaha claims that owners get in 13 percent more track time than the "industry average" and are far more interested in the handling traits of their motorcycle(s) than they are in adding more power.

So, if the typical big-bore sportbike guy is in his mid-thirties, likes to take it to the track a little more than his neighbor after commuting all week so he can sort out the handling on his heavily-ridden machine, what do you suppose that says about what Yamaha did with the 2007 R1?

To put us in the know, Yamaha invited a cadre of journos to the current home of the US MotoGP, Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca in Monterey, CA. It was here that we would see if we could discern if all this new techno wizardry had dramatically improved the R1 or simply brought it on par with the competition.

Earlier this fall Yamaha revealed what's behind the all-new R1. This year the bike came with some acronyms, but not enough to rival say, a BMW touring bike with all the options. We covered the meat of what this technology does in the September unveiling of the bike, but it bears covering again in detail.

If you haven't heard, Yamaha made some pretty big news when they broke a long-standing tradition and did away with their time-honored five-valve layout. The two remaining titanium intake valves increased in size to 31mm from three 23.5mm bits, while the two steel exhaust valves keep their '06 dimensions of 25mm. Valve angles have also changed to match the new head. The single intake's angle is now 11.5 degrees while the exhaust is now 12.5 degrees. The 2006 model's two intake side valve angles were 15.75 degrees with the center valve angle - remember it was a five-valve head - at 8.75 degrees and the exhaust angle was 11 degrees. Speaking of valves, lift was also raised on both the intake and exhaust cams, from 7.6 to 9.2mm and 7.5 to 8.3mm respectively.

The end result is a cylinder head that has a greater intake volume thanks in part to a high-lift cam profile, and a compression ratio that was bumped from 12.4:1 to 12.7:1. This has allegedly improved combustion efficiency, and power across the low, mid and top ends, and thanks to a smoother combustion chamber and re-shaped pistons -- specifically designed with the new head in mind -- the R1's cleaner-burning power plant can meet stringent 2008 emissions standards. We know how much you worry about cleaner-burning motorcycles.

Oddly enough, bore and stroke is unchanged from 77mm by 53.6mm. But in order to deal with the increased power from the new head, the connecting rods were strengthened by adding more material in all the right places.

New head aside, the R1's other large overhaul was in fueling and all that it entails. More big numbers pop up when we look at the throttle bodies. Though they still have the same 45mm bore, they no longer use a measly four injector holes, but a whopping 12 holes are employed to improve atomization. But adding more holes is about as low-tech as improving the fueling gets. Borrowing from its little brother, the R6, the 2007 R1 now utilizes YCC-T or Yamaha Chip Controlled - Throttle. Some people just like to call it throttle by wire. Simply put, it's a system comprised of an accelerator position sensor (APS), throttle position sensor (TPS) and opening and closing throttle "wires." With the 32-bit Denso ECU calculating throttle grip position and throttle valve opening every one thousandth of a second, a tiny motor performs the actual work of opening and closing the throttle. For those of you paralyzed with fear after watching the Matrix trilogy, the rider can still close the throttle "mechanically" by wire if electricity is interrupted.

One more grouping of consonants and a single vowel make headlines on the '07 R1. YCC-I or Yamaha Chip Controlled - Intake is Team Blue's fancy name for what they initially called variable intake length. In the simplest of terms, a small servo motor extends intake snorkels for low to mid-range power from 65mm to 140mm. Over 10,400 RPM the funnels are reeled back to 65mm by a servo motor for improved top-end power. This action takes place in the tiny span of three-tenths of a second, so long as the throttle valve has been opened past 57.5 at 10,400 RPM. The system isn't so much "variable" as it is one selecting one length or the other. So just remember that short funnels are better for top-end power and long funnels are for low and mid-range power.

It's a stretch, but with the powerful ECU managing the YCC-T that ultimately adjusts for less-than-perfect rider judgment, and the YCC-I that enhances power on the fly, this dynamic duo gets close to what was heretofore unknown to motorcycles en mass: traction control. True traction control involves the monitoring of rear wheel speed against front wheel speed, and momentarily reducing power to the rear wheel if sensors indicate that it's spinning faster than the front. Nevertheless, YCC-T veils, for lack of a better term, response to the rider's input. BMW looks to have the bugs worked out of their ASC (Automatic Stability Control) enough to offer it on 2007 K and R models as an option.

Not quite as impressive as the changes to the head or fueling, but important nonetheless, are the "stick" ignition coils, a curved, twin-fan radiator with 13 percent more surface area for improved cooling, new titanium exhaust system - still in the twin-under-the-seat variety - and the same slipper clutch found on the 2006 R1 LE. To accommodate the slipper clutch the tranny main shaft was lengthened by five millimeters. Otherwise, the transmission retains the same ratios as the '06 R1, no matter how tall they may seem to be.

Carrying this new engine around is the job of an equally-new frame and swing arm. With a focus on "maximizing rigidity in cast parts and flex in extruded parts" the frame was redesigned to improve front-end feel in the corners and improve "rigidity balance." A cross member was eliminated and a reinforcing rib was added to the frame. Yamaha claims 50 percent less vertical flex, 24 percent less sideways flex and 25 percent less torsional flex. The swing arm is also new. The pivot point has been raised three millimeters in order to increase room for race tires - or to "minimize chain tension of drive power", whichever sounds better to you - and the rear arm of the aluminum-truss swingarm is 16mm longer. The overall focus of the new swinger is improved cornering "turn in" and greater traction upon acceleration out of the turn. This is achieved by increasing torsional rigidity by as much as 30 percent while actually decreasing lateral rigidity a smidgen. In addition to changes to the frame, Yamaha decreased fork offset from 30mm to 25mm and increased trail from 97mm to 102mm.

The obvious idea here is that you'll get improved front-end feel and steering response.

Suspension components also receive upgrades with the new 43mm KYB front end getting larger diameter pistons -- 20mm to 24mm -- aluminum damping rods, reduced inner tube-wall thickness and a stronger axle bracket. The end result is said to be better damping with less cavitation and lighter weight. The new Soqi rear shock has a revised progressive damping rate with a high and low-speed compression adjuster, an increased link lever rate - from eight percent to 14 percent - and a spring rate that was increased to 11.5 percent. What they want to achieve with the revised suspenders is a bike that will have better traction out of corners and a firm feel that's in character with the new frame.

While they were down in the suspension area, Yamaha figured they should improve the brakes while they were at it. Gone are the now-classic four pots and in their place you'll find six-piston binders that crush down on 310mm rotors. The rotors are downsized by roughly 10mm from last year, but because of where the brake pad will ride in the new calipers, effective braking area remains the same, so says Team Blue. It's worth noting that they will use two pads on each side of each caliper. In other words, each caliper will have two small pads and two slightly larger pads. The objective here was to create even pad wear since the new caliper is long compared to most four-piston setups. This resizing and relocating of braking bits apparently reduces "inertial moment" at the axle, which is said to result in a lighter feel.

While you're still looking at the bottom half of the motorcycle you'll find track-ready Pirelli Corsa Diablos connecting the bike to the tarmac. Pirelli specifically engineered a set of Diablos for the R1 and they will carry TL Diablo Corsa E designation for the front and TL Diablo Corsa L for the rear. So remember when you head off to get some new rubber for your 2007 R1 to not ask for off-the-shelf Diablos. Make sure the retailer is aware that you need the E and L designation.

With a lot of energy put into redesigning virtually every aspect of the bike, you might expect the bike to look dramatically different. Not so much on the all-new R1. The bodywork is improved in the areas of air-flow management in that it closely resembles the R6's "tunnels" for better heat transfer, has increased openings for the ram-air, and the windscreen receives a hop-up by growing 10mm and is fastened to the bodywork without screws. In the cockpit you can expect to gaze upon a new "multi-function meter", or tachometer and speedometer as MO likes to call them. As a final touch, the tail section was redesigned with a new taillight and the exhaust cans were rotated upward; it's all for aesthetics and they make no bones about that.

If you find yourself thinking that the bike looks basically like it has for a number of years now, you'd be right. Yamaha falls back to their research of R1 owners for justification for keeping the general look of the bike the same. The fact is - at least according to them - that many R1 customers didn't go with another brand because they liked the looks of the R1 so much. Stick with what you know.

The myriad of changes are all fine and good in terms of keeping up with what the competition is doing, but has the bike mellowed with age? Most certainly not! In short, this newest R1 leaves little to complain about, at least in terms of a track environment.

With what seemed like my own private track day at Laguna Seca, I had hours of time to click off as many uninterrupted laps as I wanted. This was my first trip to Laguna so my time assessing the bike was impeded a little by the learning curve I had to wrestle with while getting to know the track that Nicky Hayden captured two US GP victories on. By midday I had most of the lines figured out and I was able to try to sort some of the nuances of one very fast motorcycle.

Anyone who has ridden or currently rides an R1 will find the fit to be familiar; not much has changed in the ergos overall. Comparatively speaking, the bike feels a hair bigger than the GSX-R1000, but nevertheless it is by no means a lumbering oaf. But before I could start discerning anything about the handling I had to keep myself from being blinded with ecstasy over the power, or rather how smoothly and quickly the power comes on. As one of my contemporaries said during a break, "Linear just doesn't seem to do the bike justice."

The premise behind the YCC-T and YCC-I is to give the rider a seamless transition through the low, middle and top end. And that it does, in spades. In practice the YCC-T will compensate for a ham-fisted rider who wants to slam the throttle open too soon and decide the best time to give him the boost he thinks he wants. Like coming out of a corner for example; on a bike with similar power but without the advantage of an ECU and YCC-T to temper the rider's enthusiasm, the rear tire could spin up quite easily. Trust me on this one; I speak from experience. Instead, with the R1 I discovered that wicking up the throttle early on - note that I still tried to ride with all the smoothness I could muster - only resulted in a constant but powerful rush of power that effortlessly propelled me to the next turn or shift point, whichever came first. I encountered what was a barely perceptible soft spot in acceleration in the neighborhood of 6000 rpm and lasted for about 1000 rpm. One of the more elite journalists felt that there was a flat spot around 7500 rpm that was still haunting the R1 from the 2006 model. Regardless of who had the more accurate seat-of-the-pants-meter, the reality is that fueling is very sensitive and responsive across the map without any abruptness or stumble.

I wish I could comment on the YCC-I, but I can't point to any one time where I noticed its presence. And that's just what Yamaha wants. Seamless, I say. Seamless! What I can comment on with respect to acceleration, other than its fluidity, is the frenetic blast of power that comes on near 13000 rpm. When I was cresting the rise that begins turn one at the end of the front straight of Laguna whilst trying to reach the top of third gear at an indicated 135mph, I found myself thinking, "Getting a kick in the arse that close to redline is akin to flying a little too close to the sun." Eventually I got over it and learned to stretch it out a bit over the rise, and I enjoyed every moment of it.

With relatively long straights leading into turns two and five, these corners proved to be a good place to double up some work and check out the slipper clutch. I fear that I'm becoming a lazy rider with the current number of bikes adding back-torque limiting clutches. It's all too easy to stomp down a couple of times on the shifter and let the clutch do the work of bringing engine speed in harmony with tarmac velocity. The R1's slipper clutch may not be the smoothest I've ridden, but then again I'm sure I'm not the smoothest rider the R1 has lugged around. Carry enough speed and let the clutch out carelessly, and chances are good that the bike will fuss and pitch just enough to let you know you need to be smoother next time. Then again maybe it wasn't all me. Standing along pit row, I could hear rider after rider approach turn 11 with reckless abandon as the R1's rear tire chirped and squawked under protest. In the end nobody was worse for the wear, riders or clutches.

Oops! I nearly forgot to mention the transmission. You'll forgive me though, as the tranny is literally quite forgettable. It's so transparent that you don't realize that shifting is an activity you have to perform to keep going around the track.

If the front end isn't clawing at the sky - which it does effortlessly in first and second gears - you're probably going to be doing one of two things: accelerating or braking. I mentioned above how well-sorted fueling and power are, so that leaves the brakes. They're quite easy to summarize really. I had enough stopping power on hand that two fingers may have been overkill in many parts of the course. And they provide enough feel that initial braking with one finger was a good way to assess just how much force I was going to need to apply. Finally, at no point did I experience or hear of another faster, later-braking journalist complain of fade. The new six-pot binders are well suited to this screamer of a motorcycle. The only other brakes I've used that felt similar were the Brembos on the '07 Aprilia Tuono and the binders on Kawasaki's ZX-14.

After all the hot-rodding and gravity-defying braking are over with it's time to set into the turn, look where you want to go and start getting on the gas. The new frame and lengthened swing arm make easy work of this. The bike is simply unflappable throughout cornering. No amount of mid-turn braking or line changing brought it out of shape. Steering response is light; I could initiate minor direction changes by simply moving my head in one direction or another. It will be interesting to ride this machine on the street to see how it responds to transitional forces in some quick and tight canyon twisties. In the meantime I only had the famed Corkscrew as the most challenging test of this trait. At no time while flipping from left to right and dropping into the pit that is the bottom of the top, so to speak, was the R1 anything other than light and willing.

The great steering and turn-in qualities are no doubt aided by the trouble-free suspenders. In the early laps I speculated that rebound and/or preload in the rear may have been too aggressive for my 165 lbs as I came down the rough patch in the Corkscrew. But as the day wore on and I churned out lap after lap, I realized that the issue was with that particularly bumpy section rather than any number of suspension settings being slightly less than perfect. Rebound, preload, etc. were more than sufficient for my skill set at every other point on the circuit.

Finally, not to be left out of the accolades, I must commend Yamaha's choice of the Pirelli Diablo Corsa. Both warm-up time and grip were superb. But far, far more amazing then their ability to assist or enhance the handling qualities of the bike was their low wear rate. After a very long day of constant flogging by very quick journos in 70 degree temps, every tire that I was able to look at showed little, if any signs of significant abuse. I'll confidently say that most fast trackday riders could get, at a minimum, two track days on a set and still be able to enjoy plenty of street mileage. They are just that good.

With so many changes on tap to make the 2007 R1 such a stellar motorcycle, it's hard to imagine what Yamaha is planning for the bike's 10 year anniversary in '08. Believe it or not, the mighty R1 is getting older, but it certainly isn't aging.

 

Tasmania  – leave Sat 3rd   March – return Mon 12th March, 2007

Tasmania is motorcycle heaven: few people, fantastic roads and scenery, relatively cheap accommodation, and the locals speak the same language and love tourists. As per last time, we will set up base camps and do day trips, moving every few days to a different location. Whether you attend an organized day ride or follow your own itinerary is up to you. Usually we meet each night over a meal and share the day’s experiences.

The plan is to go for 8 days leaving on a Saturday and returning the following Labour Day Monday. This was the successful formula we used in 2003 and 2005. We usually have a couple of cars to carry the luggage, allowing us to ride unencumbered. The first week in March avoids the school holidays and has the greatest chance of fine weather and adequate daylight hours. 

The plan is to travel during the day for $228 per person return. Check out the prices at: http://www.spiritoftasmania.com.au as they fluctuate a bit. Bike $90 return. Car $138 return. These prices are current as of 31st October, 2006.

Last time we had 18 people, 15 bikes, 3 cars and travelled between 2,500 and 3,600 km each, and had fantastic weather for 85% of the time. Deposit ($228 plus $90 = $318) into Club bank account with YOUR NAME if you and bike. If car and driver, then (228+138=366). Legging it: $228

I have booked for 8 people.  Is your name on the list? This is the last call.